Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vanja Gudelj vs Gio Jang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gudelj vs Jang analysis and find out who is favored!
Vanja Gudelj vs Gio Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gudelj 1 - 0 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gudelj has won 37.46% of points on their second serve, while Jang has won 42.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gudelj, in recent form, has won 54.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 56.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.36% and 36.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gudelj has saved 44.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 41.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gudelj has won 41.86% of matches played (W/L 18/ 25), with Jang winning 45.45% (W/L 10/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gudelj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 24/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Gudelj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 8/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gudelj winning 1 times and Jang being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gudelj winning 2 and Jang winning 0. The last match between Gudelj and Jang was at the W35 Antalya, 08-01-2024, Q3, Clay with Vanja Gudelj getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gudelj and Jang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gudelj winning 0 times and Jang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gudelj winning 0, and Jang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gudelj has played against opponents with an average rank of 31.81 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 116.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gudelj has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 83% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gudelj has converted 49.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 34.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
36% (27-47)
Career Total W/L
50% (33-33)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
43% (3-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Vanja Gudelj vs Gio Jang For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gudelj VS Jang
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Vanja Gudelj | Gio Jang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (37/56) | 48% (24/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 33% (8/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (31/50) | 41% (23/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Gio Jang
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vanja Gudelj | Gio Jang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 43% (3/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (22/28) | 40% (6/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (199/235) | 45% (62/76) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (10/14) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 57 | 116.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (500/783) | 45% (98/220) |
| 1st Serve W% | 50% (251/500) | 66% (65/98) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (106/283) | 43% (52/122) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (51/103) | 34% (10/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (371/786) | 44% (107/245) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (6/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (10/24) | 43% (3/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Vanja Gudelj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Mozgaleva
Player
Vanja Gudelj
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michelle Khomich
Player
Vanja Gudelj
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Alonso
Player
Vanja Gudelj
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-2 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Alessandra Xibilia
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Sramkova
Player
Vanja Gudelj
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Bianca Bulat
Player
Vanja Gudelj
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gio Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Gio Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gio Jang
Player
Zumra Balkan
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
11
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vanja Gudelj
Player
Gio Jang
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gio Jang
Player
Yoana Radulova
41%
(
36 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
48%
(
25 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Gio Jang
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gio Jang
Player
Nicol Benesova
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Gudelj Vs Jang Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gudelj are available here and Jang photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Vanja Gudelj
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
